North Texas
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
248  Josephine Adams SR 20:29
416  Charlotte Wilson SO 20:49
783  Christina Taylor SO 21:19
1,055  Magdalana Escobar SO 21:37
2,218  Yvette Hernandez SO 22:49
2,276  Laura Cortez SO 22:53
2,429  Carly Griffith SR 23:05
2,723  Kylee Kittrell SO 23:25
2,790  Leesa Morales JR 23:31
2,836  Kaitlyn Newton SO 23:35
3,421  Allison Choi FR 25:00
National Rank #113 of 340
South Central Region Rank #10 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 10th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 52.2%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Josephine Adams Charlotte Wilson Christina Taylor Magdalana Escobar Yvette Hernandez Laura Cortez Carly Griffith Kylee Kittrell Leesa Morales Kaitlyn Newton Allison Choi
Ken Garland Invitational 09/28 1153 20:34 21:32 21:40 21:47 22:49 22:46 24:07 22:40 23:26 23:36 24:53
Chile Pepper Festival 10/05 1064 20:38 20:41 21:07 21:27 22:51 22:34 23:26 23:54 23:39 23:43 25:10
Conference USA Championships 11/02 1057 20:30 20:43 21:18 21:24 22:20 23:21 22:54 23:32 23:27
South Central Region Championships 11/15 1052 20:24 20:43 21:16 21:53 23:20 23:02 22:36





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 10.4 280 0.0 0.2 1.0 8.0 17.3 25.7 25.2 17.3 4.7 0.5 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Josephine Adams 3.9% 129.3
Charlotte Wilson 0.1% 171.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Josephine Adams 18.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.8 1.1 1.4 2.1 2.7 3.6 4.5 4.6 5.8 5.9 6.8 6.6 6.2 5.3 5.3 4.7 4.8 3.9 3.7
Charlotte Wilson 30.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.9 1.6 1.6 2.1 2.4 2.9 3.3 3.9 4.1
Christina Taylor 47.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1
Magdalana Escobar 62.7
Yvette Hernandez 120.1
Laura Cortez 123.1
Carly Griffith 130.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.0% 0.0 5
6 0.2% 0.2 6
7 1.0% 1.0 7
8 8.0% 8.0 8
9 17.3% 17.3 9
10 25.7% 25.7 10
11 25.2% 25.2 11
12 17.3% 17.3 12
13 4.7% 4.7 13
14 0.5% 0.5 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
SMU 33.5% 1.0 0.3
Total 0.3
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0